“TFP Newsletter”, Vol. IV –
No. 2 – 1984 (www.tfp.org)
Largest
Turnout in Years
ANTIABORTION
RALLY REBUKES SOFTLINERS
“WE DEFEND the right to life of the innocents. He who
defends great moral principles with true conviction will never be
defeated."
With this statement emblazoned on one of its three
banners, The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property
(TFP) joined over 75,000 other anti-abortion demonstrators in
This year's
The turnout illustrated that even after suffering from
both a major Supreme Court decision that struck down a number of state laws
restricting abortion and the defeat of the Hatch amendment last June, pro-life
groups and grassroots supporters are growing and maturing. They have realized
that the so-called "moderate" position has meant delays and only
favors the abortionists. "No Compromise" was the theme of the
Eleventh Annual March For Life.
"The soft line did not work any more than did
Chamberlain's effort to negotiate with Hitler for peace. So, we have relearned
hard lessons — the abortionists will not accept even a little bit of
pro-life." One is either for or against the killing of innocent preborn children. There is no position in between,"
read the statement of March For Life president Nellie
J. Gray.
After pro-life leaders met with President
Reagan, a number of prominent speakers and members of Congress addressed the
crowd at the Ellipse behind the White House around
The American TFP was well represented by a large
number of members, volunteers and supporters who distributed a statement
rebuking the inaction of the "soft" antiabortionists — those who do
not act energetically against the heinous crime.
The TFP document pointed out that it is not the
pressure of pro-abortionists that maintains legalized abortion in the
It went on to note that "If there were a danger
that more than one million innocent Americans would be executed in the next
year, it is certain that all Americans would be so indignant that the elected
officials who were in any way partisans of this unjust execution would be
clamorously defeated in the next elections."
The March ended in front of the Supreme Court
Building, but the indignation of the marchers continued to he felt throughout
the balls of the Houses of Congress as they dispersed to seek out their local
Senators and Congressmen.